Member-only story

How much of a joke is Sex-Based Rights in Feminism?

It turns out, quite a lot actually

--

Ahead of my point here, the International Human Rights Law scholar (who specialises in sex and gender within IHRL, and especially gender recognition) Sandra Duffy has thrown her expertise into the ring with an absolutely blistering takedown from a legal perspective.

It is important to note from the outset that ‘sex-based rights’ are a fiction with the pretense of legality and do not in fact exist in the manner that the term is used…

Firstly, there are no such thing in IHRL as ‘sex-based rights.’ As explained repeatedly in this post, there are no rights which inhere in a person based on their physical characteristics. There is such a thing as protection from discrimination based on sex,..

Secondly, and rather obviously, lesbians are not a sex class and therefore could not have ‘sex-based’ rights, even if such a thing were possible…

Thirdly, CEDAW itself recognises that the categories of ‘man’ and ‘woman,’ which the Declaration believes to correlate to immutable physical sex, are in fact socially constructed.

I don’t have much respect for “Sex-Based Rights”, I’ll admit it. The concept is absolutely meaningless and should be ridiculed by every feminist worth listening to. I’ve laid out my argument for why a number of times on Twitter and I figured I ought to adapt it for this platform.

Gail Parminter MSc @gailparminter · Feb 16, 2020 Replying to @2damntrans @KatyMontgomerie and @AlixWzl Surely only female sex can be pregnant? Females have been and are oppressed based on this fact? If not I’m open to persuasion… Mallory Moore @Chican3ry · Feb 16, 2020 People didn’t decide abortion rights were necessary because people bearing pregnancies were female. They were decided to be necessary because people bearing pregnancies need the bodily autonomy to choose
Mallory Moore @Chican3ry · Feb 16, 2020 Replying to @Chican3ry @gailparminter and 3 others If that day ever comes, will trans women or cis men bearing pregnancies through reproductive technology be allowed to terminate those pregnancies? Serious question. Will any of the arguments seriously be that different than the autonomy which the original debate was based on? Gail Parminter MSc @gailparminter · Feb 16, 2020 Replying to @Chican3ry @2damntrans and 2 others Get your

My first and foremost problem with it is that sex-based rights invert the reality of almost all anti-discrimination logic that exists in the real world, including the feminist project for women’s liberation generally. Marital Rape was a product of differentiated sex-based rights, male primogeniture is a sex-based right. It’s hard to think of a single instance where different rights applying by sex has ever worked out well for women because the nature of patriarchal discrimination is to make sure that these rights work against women’s interests.

Feminists have known this for decades. In 1974, in the book “Sex Discrimination and the Law”, feminist legal…

--

--

Mallory Moore
Mallory Moore

Written by Mallory Moore

Trying to develop a gender abolition worthy of the wider abolitionist feminism movement.

Responses (3)

Write a response